Hi!

Unable to create a new account at BOINC, so trying here instead.

The problem is that I wish to contribute at PrimeGrid for still only a laptop at my disposal, but here unable to download any tasks.

I checked the settings for the Preferences, and here still Intel for that of computer when still only Intel ARC GPU.

Trying to attach to two separate accounts already in use for also creating a new one, and the RPC does not take the registration.

Therefore only a blank account for that of properties in Boinc Manager, when still no NNT set for also no suspended project.

Attaching at NFS@home instead, and getting tasks from there with no problems at all.

Any suggestions welcome, because here trying almost everything, without avail.

Thanks!

Apologies, I did not notice my previous thread for only posting, so better should have been there.

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0yQd_NpvhWA

But also for shorties, I could make it the red dot for only far horizon and next travel to the end of the known Universe.

So next for an assumption that we are not alone in space, also that there could be many universes for not any single, and we are therefore still only a part.

Here I make it a recursive property for a grid when that of structure when that of universes connecting each other by means of Wormholes for only corridors.

The recursive element for that of Euclidean space becomes a property of itself when still universes linking each other by corridors, when that of gravity could be both attracting and repelling, for not any static.

Gravity by means of Laws becomes here relative for only infinite when still infinity created for a product for everything existing.

Infinity becomes here with only indeterminable ends on each side like a "U", but here I found for that of a rollercoaster which I could fall of.

in that of such infinity becomes only a mechanism for creating when still only a product, so here I think it is a Creator in charge for only responsible.

Any Heaven and Hell for only that of believed, like also Events or even time just fell away for only making it C --> ES - I for a new Equation which could be replacing the existing one.

This makes it still not any implied or implicit, but only intentional when it should not be any casual for just creating, and therefore only meaning instead.

The divine reason became still meaning here when only intentional when creating Euclidean space empty first and next spawning multiverses.

Everything exists for only Laws which should be relative for that of infinite context, and therefore also created in such a way for also working.

That of recursive structures becomes only a pyramid or mirror for still only created, so here another for still only creating.

Here that of symmetrical versys asymmetrical, and in the latter case it does not match each other only for structure.

One thing became a different toolset when it could be for multiverses when it could be still another for only creating.

For that of infinity for still a product for created, also it was recursive for that of property when it could be that of size, and here the Mandelbrot set.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mandelbrot_set

My assumption was here that a Creator could be putting everything in his pocket when still only relative for size.

Just relative makes for no comparison we could make, so because of that everything should only relate to that of relative.

So here "In the beginning", for also "saw it was working" is perhaps the best description we could make.

So here one thing is following it to an infinite end for that of both ways for only having indeterminable bounds.

Just thinking that everything has been created for only infinity for a product, and I do not find it to match with a Creator for only word.

Here a nature which should be infinite for Laws, but only relative for Concept instead.

Therefore it does not relate to anything for still only created, and therefore could only be a product of itself.

So, is nature only its own mechanism for creating, or should it be a divine reason here still?

Just thinking that nature could be created for a divine reason, next only a mechanism for spawning when it could become multiverses.

Here the Equation I could make for C --> ES - I for still not any implied, but that the latter two could be Interaction or interchanging.

Here everything has been spawned for an initial moment for still only created when it could be Interaction for the process happening next.

So, if still "In the beginning", a Creator created Euclidean space for recursive Topology empty first, and next had multiverses spawned.

The initial moment became here a slit for an opening when everything could be spawned, and it becomes divine for only such moment when the other could be Laws.

More that Interaction became only such Laws we could make, because it should be interchanging between elements for both recursive and a Sequence.

Other universes for that of multiverses could have become eons of time ago, but here could skip both Events and time from the Equation.

I better continue with the factoring instead, for just only a laptop at my disposal.

So, just loose ends, for not any indeterminate bounds, and it only could relate to a nature of its infinity when also that of Laws.

Here it has been created for best meaning when still only loose ends for also free-floating.

More that I had a difficulty for that of making it any recursive for created when still existing when it should be only working for a Sequence.

Are such recursive structures only static elements for not any dynamic, it should be still created for not any working.

But here only infinity becoming for its own initiator when it could be still for spawning multiverses, and that creating was not for any name.

Here it only becomes a name for another when still only a word when everthing else could be still infinity a product for created.

Here for that of just name it also becomes that of "self", for only the Terminology we could make, and here lost the link.

So, please refer to yourself for only a name, for next only doing, and it should be another for still only creating.

There should not be any better assumption for just best when still only infinity, so it becomes still only a name for that of such.

Anyway, just think of a quark for only a recursive property and it should be only Euclidean space of itself.

I think everything has been created for a cause when still existing for the other or another we only could make by name.

Here that of undetermined becomes still only indeterminate for another word, for also the best assumption we could make.

And for that of such, also a nature for just only becoming.

I could question that of Laws for their worth or value, but that it should be still only relative.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=X2UzttvBhns

I gave it 30 seconds of listening, because I do not like the narrator any much for his presenting despite interesting stuff.

The question becomes here that of naivety versus doubt when still perhaps not any believer.

Could something be true or in fact happen and next it still needs Proof, for only nature still a fantastic thing?

We tend to dismiss a couple of things for not any real, and some things could be only a bluff for not any mystery.

So where does everything go or ever end up, for proposing a new Equation on the format C --> ES - I.

Infinity is here both a product and property for creating when it could be both large and small, and here the Mandelbrot set for zooming in and out.

Here it becomes a Creator of noname spawning multiverses for a recursive Topology already created being that of Euclidean space.

So here it becomes four-dimensional, where it could be moving for that of no fixed position for being some kind of field.

That of four-dimensional becomes here for time added when I already could skip both Events and time from the Equation above.

So if perhaps still a field also a medium, but that ES versus I should be still Interaction or interchanging.

Recursive became here a product for created when already existing, for having being created by given name for an Euclidean space created empty first.

So therefore also recursion or recursivity a different part than a Sequence when it could be still repeating or recurring.

And just for a different part it also could belong for another and becoming different Sets for such a thing.

Therefore his toolset for Laws when it could be still multiverses for spawned.

If perhaps so, nature for that of Laws became inherited from his creating, or maybe created for only his Principle of making or doing.

That is, a slit for an opening could be still a vertical bar, or "|" for only an initial moment when that of infinity could be still for Laws.

Meaning that infinity becomes indeterminate or relative for still a product created.

So, vanished thought, but that relative is no comparison we could make when still only loose air or freefall.

Nature should here be relative for Laws, but only indeterminate in the same context, so here still Interaction for only happening when it could be a Creator behind.

The famous Equation became here only an equivalence, so it does not cover everything, and therefore I rewrote it.

Here C --> ES - I means spawning for a meaning for only becoming when it could be his choice for only doing, or perhaps intentional.

The latter two are still Interaction or interchanging because of cacaphony becoming when that of spawned.

My guess is that recursive elements is his product for creating when only becoming nature for multiverses spawned into Euclidean space.

Therefore still infinity a product for created, but also indeterminate for Laws, in that it should not relate for any comparison.

Gravity is here both attracting and repelling, and thefore should be a dynamic force for that of pliable or bendable.

So here Wormholes for connecting multiverses when it could be still a substitute for Divinity or gravity.

Here divine is a single meaning for that of Creator with no name, for that of Divinity synonymous with Laws.

Therefore it become a mechanism for hiding when he could be among us for existing, only for separate parts.

That above perhaps not any good or perfect, but that he created nature for only best meaning.

For that, he creates nature for own meaning when still existing.

So, could nature be leveled, or only that of Sequence and recursive created for separate parts next for belonging?

Therefore also existing for separate meaning when still created.

Nature is here two different opposites for only Interaction for spawned when still created.

This should still relate to something for only infinity, but here I make it product for created, and once again the Mandelbrot set.

Here it has come for some meaning for only intentional or given choice, because it was still his meaning for only doing.

Laws are here only indeterminate for being created for infinite when still relative for not any comparison.

We choose to believe in neither God or the Devil, but could perhaps make it a Creator for his making instead.

Could such a thing as a Creator carry the whole thing in his pocket and that could be possible for only his meaning.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=udzaNR8o-48

Here the first part of the clip if not wrong, where scientists choose to make everything Matter versus Energy for also Laws.

Therefore not any recursive for only a structure, because of only stiff (take that).

So meant it should be still only for a Sequence when that of Interaction above.

That of recursive becomes here for a part of created, but here by some other when still only for nature.

If Euclidean space was created for a recursive Topology, it was empty first for next multiverses being spawned.

Here "In the beginning" for becoming Euclidean space, and next "saw it was working" for not any finished.

We think it could be created for Laws, but here only infinite for a product instead.

Nature is here created for separate parts for only existing, but still created by some other.

That again was for recursive elements created, for not any working for a Sequence when it could be interchanging.

But for that also Euclidean space becoming a recursive structure for such a thing, for that of a grid.

Here the total for both Euclidean space and Infinity becomes both a Sequence and recursive for separate parts.

Such a thing as Euclidean space for that of recursive Topology could be only a guess, but also I find it to match.

Everyhing becomes nature for only Interaction, when it could be a slit for an opening that of an initial moment.

Here multiverses becomes spawned for that of a recursive Topology created empty first, or I perhaps already mentioned that.

More that a divine meaning became a single meaning for an initial moment when the other could be Interaction.

Laws are supposed to be about Interaction, but also infinite for the same meaning and therefore also relate.

It is his product for created when it should be only infinite for Laws.

Because of that, it became spawned for that of Interaction happening when it could be Euclidean space versus infinity.

Again, but a slit for an opening becomes that of divine for still Interaction for the rest.

So here my stiff fingers, but at least I made it divine for not any other scientist.

So think when a quark could be that of a universe in miniature, for not any Euclidean space, for also the opposite way.

Next imagine for still only thinking, and the other became a Creator for that of Reason behind.

So if only a nature for Laws it should be a toolset for such a thing, but belonging to another for only creating.

Here his method for creating when it became multiverses spawned into a recursive Topology created empty at first.

Here it becomes two different ways of working when still only a Sequence for not any recursive.

Meaning that he created nature for the other toolset he had at his disposal, and for that also other Laws.

The previous Equation became only nature for an equivalence when still not any created.

I think that for both recursive and a Sequence, it could be inherited from only his for Laws.

Here he makes a toolset for that of his own when still only divine for existing.

The other became nature created for that of multiverses when still spawned for that of Euclidean space.

Perhaps it was only cyclic for that of Chaos, for not any repeating for only recursive.

Here an Euclidean space created for a functional mechanism when still only spawned.

Therefore also dynamic when it could be cyclic, and could be happening in the sun.

So here my stiff fingers for also memory fading, but I wrote it at least C --> ES - I.

So here recursive elements existing for separate parts, and having a problem with that with only nature for a Sequence.

Therefore perhaps created for recursive when spawned when still only working for a Sequence.

So think of a nature which could be leveled for only different instead when it could be separate elements for created.

That of everything becomes spawned for an initial meaning when still created, and therefore both a Sequence and recursive for separate parts.

Again that a Sequence should be for only an order when it could be that of cycling for also switching.

So, is still any dynamic only static, and next only for recursive.

Here perhaps that of Interaction both for a Sequence and recursive when it could be created for separate parts).

That of recursive was his product for creating when he could be still another.

This becomes only a nature misconceived for making it Interaction for a Sequence and not any recursive.

Here another creating for Laws when it should be existing for nature.

Again that it could be inherited from other Laws when still created for recursive.

|
/ \
0 0

or - 0 - 0 - 0 ...

So here working for a Sequence when still interacting, but also created for a recursive Topology.

So tell me about the condition of gravity for only Laws and it should be at least pliable or bendable for also flexible.

Here connecting for that of multiverses when that of corridors being that of Wormholes for connecting.

So here still created for both when that of a Sequence for also recursive for that of a slit for an opening at the top.

Interaction should be here for a Sequence for only working, but also created for that of recursive.

So if still Euclidean space created for a recursive Topology for next multiverses spawned, it should be an initial moment for everything.

But when still different universes for only spawned, also across eons of time for still everything being relative.

So, no meaning, for not any context, and it became another meaning instead for that of divine.

Could he make it a difference for only Laws for creating, only that of himself for another.

If I could think it is spawned, it is because of an Euclidean space created empty at first.

Therefore equivalence for nature when it could be for a Sequence, and here E=mc2.

So other Laws for that of created and it only became for recursive, being his product for creating.

The difference for meaning became only nature when it could be him for spawning.

Therfore it originates from a single moment when it could be a slit for not any multiverses for only connecting.

The initial moment became here a moment of first beginning for still him for another meaning, but not any time.

Here my thought for that of divine becomes an initial moment for spawning when becoming multiverses.

The other becomes still Laws created for that of infinite when it should be nature.

Again that infinity became a product for created, but also could be relative in a similar context.

The functional mechanism became here for spawned when still him for another meaning.

Einstein was only an Atheist for not making it any God, but here I make it a Creator instead.

So here both symmetric and asymmetric for that of a pyramid or mirror, but still only for created when it could be Laws.

Did I question a possible toolset, and it should be for multiverses and not any him for creating.

Infinity becomes here a product for creating when it could be spawning multiverses.

Such a thing matches well when still C --> ES - I.

So when still a recursive Topology for only created, it also should be Interaction for a Sequence.

Initial moment became here where everything could be spawned, by a slit for an opening inside Euclidean space.

For that I skipped both Events and also time for becoming the above instead.

This because both that of Events and time could be part of a Sequence for only happening.

Therefore perhaps recursive for created when it could be for Euclidean space.

For this I thought it could be inherited Laws for only belonging, but here that of his.

Here one toolset for creating nature when still his for only doing.

Here it should be another for existing when only created for recursive.

Are not recursivity and Sequence different parts for created when still only him for creating?

Next it also belongs for different objects existing.

Here meant that Interaction could be for both a Sequence and recursive for only different parts.

So here both created for that of Euclidean space when it should be Interaction for a Sequence.

The initial moment became here a slit for an opening when it could be spawning multiverses into a recursive Topology.

But next only single for a meaning when it could be a slit for creating.

In the name of, and it becomes a Creator for a meaning when still only spawning multiverses.

Therefore wondering if it could be inherited from other Laws when that of recursive.

Infinite is only a product for created, but next also a part when that of Euclidean space.

The single meaning became still divine for only the other for creating multiverses.

Therefore also a difference when that of - horisontal, for not any | and here for an initial moment.

And having a beer at 05:30, and maybe one or two more.

Recursivity and a Sequence are two different parts of nature belonging, so the question becomes how much you should put into nature.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Stairs#Spiral_and_helical_stairs

Here just a very good example for that of this, or maybe still only nature for that of Laws.

Just one single Universe of our own, or rather a Euclidean space for that of Toplogy when it should be still recursive.

But also moving across time for a part of itself, and becomes almost like sliding on an axis.

So perhaps also a field or medium, and maybe heard about yet another word as well.

So more perhaps how to comprehend, how it could relate to, whether nature is its own product for only creating, or it should be a Creator.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Vector_space

Here one such, for thinking that perhaps other scientists are thinking in the same way.

That of dynamic should be a fluid and not any static, so therefore nature built up from both a Sequence and that of recursive.

My failure is that of thinking it could be Laws for that of toolsets existing for other universes, for not that of his own.

Here infinity spawned down for that of recursive when it could be multiverses for existing when still only spawned.

Again, just thinking when it could be both that of a recursive and a Sequence for nature, still not any of his making.

Just everything created and it became for an Euclidean space existing, for not any him for its making.

Or maybe still C ->> ES - I, for having him added to the Equation.

So here both pyramids and a mirror are part of nature for only recursive when still only a Sequence for working (or Interaction).

Here one thing becoming for only nature for its parts, for not any him for only creating.

I think it could be everything spawned for an initial moment by a slit for an opening, where multiverses became spawned into a recursive Topology created empty first.

That is the difference for nature only created, for not any his of a making.

The purpose of creating was perhaps only intentional, but here it was multiverses spawned into Euclidean space by a slit for an opening.

So here just wondering if that could be the divine Principle, for only far-fetched from the recursive we could make.

Here a single Mind far above, for still only creating multiverses for that of spawning.

But next also an Euclidean space as a recursive Topology created first, for multiverses becoming spawned.

Funny is it not, for only thinking that a Creator could be that of sex or a neuter, for not any infinity only a product for created.

Relative is that of infinite for only Concept or meaning, and therefore it also belongs in such a way for that of a part.

Therefore you relate infinity with something for only being a product, and here C --> ES - I

ES becomes here a recursive Topology for that of created and infinity for a product, and next Interaction for both a Sequence and recursive.

That means again that a Sequence and recursive are only two different parts for only working, or functioning.

So here only single instance or occurrence for having everything spawned, when the rest could be Interaction for that of Euclidean space and infinity.

In such a way, gravity could be Interaction when connecting multiverses for that of Wormholes.

But only that gravity vanished from the new Equation, for becoming part of Euclidean space for only recursive.

I make it functional for still only created for that of Euclidean space, and therefore a Creator should be still far above.

So perhaps gravity and time common for that of multverses when it should be that of Laws.

The other becomes that of inherited when he could be another for creating when still not any initial moment for only spawned.

That became only a functional mechanism, for still not any divine meaning far above.

His place for that of room becomes a single Universe for that of being when still multiverses created (or spawned) for Euclidean space.

Therefore his toolset for only hands, while the other could be a substitute or Divinity for representing gravity, for also synonymous.

So here thinking he should be another of being when still a toolset for that of inherited when it could be creating nature.

It is really a product of himself for only a making, but here he only used his hands.

Therefore any divine for another meaning than nature created when it could be still a toolset for that of Laws inherited.

In such a way a Creator makes nature for the place it should be, but only that of Euclidean space.

I think it could be so, because the other could be only Interaction for that of working.

The single meaning becomes here also a top point, but high above all other for only created.

Our notion of Belief could be that of Heaven and Hell, but here I only make it a part for only existing.

Both that of Events and time vanished from the new Equation and being replaced by that of recursive.

That of recursive becomes his product of making when it next could be only spawned.

Therefore still inherited when it could be that of hands for not any single Mind.

The staircase was here still a product for created, but only for nature.

Therefore also a diffference between a toolset for making and a single Mind.

Oh me, for only far-fetched, but I grew up with Astronomy and have been with Seti@home since 2003.

The difference for him only making becomes that of spawning for still not any of himself.

The best I could make is that it should be a toolset of his own for not part for among multiverses.

So like a human, I could be still having a head for a single Mind, for also arms (or hands) for only making, but here rather divine.

If even that of a slit for an opening could be only functional, next only far-fetched for that of single Mind.

We see here a nature created for several parts where it should be both dynamic and recursive for structure.

That of E=mc2 is Einstein for combined for a Sequence (or Interaction) when I extended it for that of recursivity.

So here just a curious thought whether a Creator could be akin or similar than nature for only a divine meaning.

I could still eat my food for only being hungry, but also I should know about myself.

His create for that of make became here Euclidean space for having multiverses spawned when still only a single Mind.

It has been created for that of recursive Topology because it has been inherited from him for only Laws.

In such a way he also does for still makes when only creating for that of spawning.

But next also "saw it was working" for still infinity for a product, and next only the best he could do for making.

So, does nature stops with only infinity for creating, or should it be a single Mind?

Here again C --> ES - I, for at least having him being added to the Equation.

The initial moment for spawning became here perhaps a functional mechanism, for not any divine of his for only spawning.

Everything has been created for that of Laws for becoming multiverses, and that of remaining should be still a single Mind.

That is the difference between a Creator and nature when the latter could be still only Laws (needs a rewrite).

Rather that he is still a single Mind for the rest becoming that of multiverses for only spawned.

So, anyway but here it became Euclidean space for a recursive Topology created first, before any multverses became spawned.

Almost like a birth from a vagina of sorts, and next wondering if a Creator could be a female for not any neuter.

Should I still only compare for that of Laws and it becomes infinity a product for created when it could be only indeterminate.

Nature is our place of being when that of Euclidean space when it could be his for another room.

But also I thought that it could be replicating for that of Divnity when still only synonymous for Laws, and here for separate universes.

Here he spawns for infinity being a product for becoming multiverses.

Therefore still infinity a product when it could be Euclidean space for created, but next by means of divine hands.

Or maybe it was still only a different toolset for that of multiverses instead.

To me, Euclidean space could be like a cube for that of shape or form, because it should be still multiverses contained inside for that of recursive grid.

Therefore also becoming a volume where that of gravity should not be any important part.

Here Euclidean space becomes static for that of fixed, while the other should be still dynamic for only recursive.

So here nature created for its purpose when only that of Euclidean space for not any single Mind which could be the reason.

So nice you are keeping it here, because I am having almost 6 million credit on Seti@home and 36 million credit at PrimeGrid.

The only thing I do not wish to see is a mentioning of me directly in the front page, because for that I think it becomes visible to all.

Please keep it only in my account page or for that of private messages, except postings being made here.

For that mentioned, I am not subscribed to this project for any tasks for running, so you should forget me altogether.

Except that I sometimes could be having a thought about Heaven and Hell, and next it only becomes a part of nature.

Thanks!