#888 closed Defect (fixed)
2nd cuda card missing
Reported by: | MarkJ | Owned by: | davea |
---|---|---|---|
Priority: | Undetermined | Milestone: | 6.8 |
Component: | Undetermined | Version: | 6.6.25 |
Keywords: | cuda | Cc: |
Description (last modified by )
2/05/2009 3:34:46 PM Processor: 8 GenuineIntel Intel(R) Core(TM) i7 CPU 920 @ 2.67GHz [x86 Family 6 Model 26 Stepping 4] 2/05/2009 3:34:46 PM Processor features: fpu tsc pae nx sse sse2 mmx 2/05/2009 3:34:46 PM OS: Microsoft Windows XP: Professional x86 Edition, Service Pack 3, (05.01.2600.00) 2/05/2009 3:34:46 PM Memory: 2.99 GB physical, 4.83 GB virtual 2/05/2009 3:34:46 PM Disk: 298.08 GB total, 289.71 GB free 2/05/2009 3:34:46 PM Local time is UTC +10 hours 2/05/2009 3:34:46 PM CUDA device (not used): GeForce GTX 260 (driver version 18250, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 96GFLOPS) 2/05/2009 3:34:46 PM CUDA device: GeForce GTX 260 (driver version 18250, compute capability 1.3, 896MB, est. 96GFLOPS) 2/05/2009 3:34:46 PM Using HTTP proxy p4sdr-vm:3128 2/05/2009 3:34:46 PM Version change (6.6.23 -> 6.6.25)
Both GTX260's worked fine under 6.6.23, but not under 6.6.25. Clearly a bug with BOINC that has been introduced since 23 as the drivers have not been updated and they both worked fine under 23. Yes I know there is a cc_config flag, but why do I need it now when I didn't before?
Change History (7)
comment:1 Changed 16 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|---|
Keywords: | 2nd missing removed |
comment:2 Changed 16 years ago by
Description: | modified (diff) |
---|
comment:3 Changed 16 years ago by
comment:4 Changed 16 years ago by
Owner: | set to davea |
---|
comment:5 Changed 16 years ago by
From a GPUgrid wu done yesterday (using 6.6.23):
# Using CUDA device 1 # Device 0: "GeForce GTX 260" # Clock rate: 1242000 kilohertz # Total amount of global memory: 939196416 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 27 # Number of cores: 216 # Device 1: "GeForce GTX 260" # Clock rate: 1242000 kilohertz # Total amount of global memory: 939261952 bytes # Number of multiprocessors: 27 # Number of cores: 216
It would appear while device 0 is the same, it is being reported as having 64k less memory.
comment:6 Changed 16 years ago by
Apparently (beta) drivers 185.81 don't show the missing 64k. This would suggest an nVidia driver issue.
User Rob Neff on Seti@home has reported the same problem using 181.22 drivers.