Changes between Version 5 and Version 6 of ValidationIntro

Timestamp:

Apr 15, 2010, 9:43:56 AM (14 years ago)

Author:

davea

Comment:

--

ValidationIntro

@@ -7 +7 @@
 Depending on various factors, you may be able to use a standard validator that comes with BOINC, or you may have to develop a custom validator.
 
-    * If your application generates exactly matching results (either because it does no floating-point arithmetic, or because you use [HomogeneousRedundancy homogeneous redundancy]) then you can use the 'sample bitwise validator' (see below).
-    * If you are using BOINC for 'desktop grid' computing (i.e. you trust all the participating hosts) then you can use the 'sample trivial validator' (see below).
-    * Otherwise, you'll need to develop a custom validator for your application. BOINC supplies a [ValidationSimple simple validator framework] in which you plug in a few short application-specific functions. This is sufficient for most projects. If you need more control over the validation process, you can use BOINC's [ValidationLowLevel low-level validator framework]. 
+ * If your application generates exactly matching results (either because it does no floating-point arithmetic, or because you use [HomogeneousRedundancy homogeneous redundancy]) then you can use the 'sample bitwise validator' (see below).
+ * If you are using BOINC for 'desktop grid' computing (i.e. you trust all the participating hosts) then you can use the 'sample trivial validator' (see below).
+ * Otherwise, you'll need to develop a custom validator for your application.
+  BOINC supplies a [ValidationSimple validator framework] in which you plug in a few short application-specific functions.
 
 Two standard validators are supplied: